It has not escaped any well-attuned management these days that employees are overflowing with strong opinions, and lots of them, often on subjects that were traditionally frowned upon as talking points in the workplace. Those days are gone, writes Ian Heinig on The Manifest.
From the Editor
“Is the adoption of sustainability practices a form of strategic differentiation that can lead to superior financial performance? Or, is it a strategic necessity that can ensure corporate survival but not necessarily outperformance?” That’s the question asked in a Harvard Business Review article that studies how sustainability affects business.
From getting dressed for work to grabbing the morning coffee and a breakfast health bar, then opening up the laptop, we connect every day with companies that are adapting to new consumer trends.
New research finds that when lopsided pay ratios between C-suite and worker compensation make the news, sales drop as consumers are “significantly less likely to buy from companies with high CEO pay ratios,” reports the Wall Street Journal. These ratios will be making big news this year, following a mandate by the SEC that now requires public U.S.
What are we to make of recent decisions by tech giants to move into the housing business?
A new survey finds that the social stances a company takes now influence buying decisions more than price. Seventy-one percent think it’s important for businesses to take a stance on social movements, such as gender equity, gun control, the environment, immigration, and human rights.
Federal and New Jersey state legislators are looking to promote diversity in corporate boards with new initiatives and proposed bills. Representative Maxine Waters (D-CA), the first woman and first African-American to chair the House Financial Services Committee, is planning to push for more women and minorities in the top ranks of corporate America.
Using numbers to set targets and measure achievement is the generally accepted practice in many areas of business. But does setting numerical quotas to improve gender diversity on corporate boards serve that purpose? Not necessarily, argues Kiersten Barnet, in a Fast Company article, “Why Quotas Alone Won’t Make Boards (or Companies) More Diverse.” Barnet is steering committee chair of the U.S. 30% Club, a group of business leaders committed to better gender balance through voluntary actions.
There is some good news to note about the auto industry behind the recent headlines about layoffs and tariff wars. Ford has completed a“saliency assessment,” a review that identifies the most important human rights issues relevant to the company. The assessment was conducted in line with the UN Guiding Principles Reporting Framework.The automaker says it will now develop an action plan to address these issues, through a specific filter of the link between environmental issues and the human rights issues that emerged from the review.
What’s in a brand name these days?
The Brands Taking Stands movement is not limited to action in the U.S. by American-based companies. Businesses in the U.K. now find themselves pushing back against government policies on Brexit that they think damaging to their bottom lines and to society in general. A public letter signed by 70 leading corporate executives has called for a “people’s vote” on any final Brexit deal.
This year’s version of the Future Investment Initiative, sponsored by the government of Saudi Arabia and referred to as "Davos in the Desert," might have to be re-branded as “Davos Deserted.” A significant number of the same top executives, corporations, media companies, and influential speakers who attended last year have cancelled their RSVPs for a return visit. A “Who’s Who” in global business and media are staying home as questions persist about the assassination of a dissident Saudi journalist in that country’s consulate in Istanbul, Turkey.
A new report from UBS surveys 5,300 investors with at least $1 million in investable assets across 10 markets to evaluate attitudes towards sustainable investing. Among the key findings: 81% align spending decisions with values; 51% of U.S.
The question of leadership threads through business practices as never before.
Behind the unending stream of headlines about executive malfeasance, there’s a lot of thought and action going on in progressive quarters about how to improve leadership training so that business can perform better. Writing in the Stanford Social Innovation Review, Andrew J. Hoffman offers insights into how management schooling for MBAs must change.
As income inequality continues to grow as a major social, political, and economic topic, the Economic Policy Institute has added fuel to the fire with its latest report on the pay of chief executives at the top 350 American companies. EPI finds that on average, the top executives earned 312 times more than workers in 2017. The heads of the largest companies received an average pay rise of 17.6%, taking home an average of $18.9 million in compensation.
A company’s ethical achievements are increased eleven-fold when employees are encouraged to base their decisions on the values and standards of the business. That’s the key finding of a new survey by the Ethics & Compliance Initiative, an alliance of organizations committed to business best practice. The ethics group lists the benefits of company programs that go beyond bare minimum standards of responsible conduct in the second installment of its Global Business Ethics Survey.
“Political polarization, voter tribalism and recent, fervent social movements like #grabyourwallet, #MeToo, and #TimesUp have changed the face of brand engagement and consumer loyalty in virtually every brand sector this year.” So writes Robert Passikoff, the founder and president of Brand Keys, in a MediaPost.com op-ed.
Workers are getting increased scrutiny from an unexpected quarter: investors. A group of international investors managing more than $12 trillion has written to 500 of the world’s top companies, calling for more information about the treatment of their employees, reports Reuters.